LastAI brings together news and popularity rankings for the technologies changing the future, such as AI, space, quantum computing, robots and chips, and shows them in a way you can follow without knowing the jargon. We gather official company announcements, news articles and expert writing along with their sources, and line technologies and companies up by popularity and evaluation so you can see at a glance what is drawing attention right now.
We gather official company announcements, news articles, company filings, videos and experts' social posts, field by field. Every item shows its source and when it was posted, with a link so you can always check the original.
The rankings show a16z's web visit, mobile user and US consumer spending rankings exactly as published. The LastAI Index separately combines public data such as product usage rankings and model companies' API usage. Each entry shows the values actually used and their sources, and we publish the formula and the dated records. Member votes and star ratings have their own sort, and ads and affiliate deals never go into the index.
The tech map and the tier list show where each field is heading at a glance, and the Daily AI Report sums up the day's AI news in a few cards. We use plain words instead of jargon.
News is collected automatically from public sources LastAI has registered (company blogs, news articles, filings, YouTube and social media). Items from outside always carry their source and are never made to look as if LastAI wrote them.
Some foreign-language social posts and the Daily AI Report are translated and summarised by AI such as Claude and GPT. AI-written text can contain mistakes, so please check the original for exact details. The Daily AI Report goes up after a fact check.
The ranking rules run in code and apply the same way to every entry. Each entry’s ‘How the score works’ shows the weights, and the AI usage methodology shows where the AI model and app usage data comes from.
How we choose sources, where we use AI and how we correct mistakes are set out in the editorial principles, and every source we currently read is listed in Sources.
If a source is wrong, a ranking calculation looks off, or you have a privacy or copyright request, please write to the address above. We look into it on the basis of evidence we can check, and put it right.
